Choice Architecture

Choice architecture seeks to affect outcomes through the manner in which the person or organization presents the choice to the decision-maker. For example, a study (Johnson E J, Goldstein D G. 2003. Do defaults save lives? Science 302: 1338-1339) states that nations that require citizens to opt-out of organ transplant donation have a significantly higher organ-donor rate than nations where the citizens must affirmatively choose to take part (opt-in).Another technique suggested is laying out various outcomes of a decision in a way that is easy for the choice-maker to understand. The literature on choice architecture builds a framework to distinguish between two types of tools that choice architects can use: those that structure a choice in a certain way, and tools that make use of how options are presented to decision-makers (Johnson E J, Shu S B, Dellaert B G C, Fox C, Goldstein D G, Haeubl G, Larrick R P, Payne J W, Schkade D, Wansink B, Weber E U. 2012. Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture. Marketing Letters 23: 487-504). To illustrate, the use of a default, where the default option will lead to a more socially desirable outcome, is an example of structuring choices. The way in which options are categorized and then presented to a decision-maker is an example of presenting options in a way that influences choice. The concept of choice architecture included permission marketing as described by Seth Godin.