<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finn Raben: Neuroscience…. Science? Magic? Or Black Arts?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neurorelay.com/2012/09/04/finn-raben-neuroscience-science-magic-or-black-arts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neurorelay.com/2012/09/04/finn-raben-neuroscience-science-magic-or-black-arts/</link>
	<description>Thinking through the mind of the consumer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2016 16:12:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Hassels Mönning (@phasselsmonning)</title>
		<link>http://neurorelay.com/2012/09/04/finn-raben-neuroscience-science-magic-or-black-arts/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Hassels Mönning (@phasselsmonning)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurorelay.com/?p=2851#comment-211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finn Raben&#039;s opening statement on 4 types of pain i.e. cost, timing, relevancy and reliability triggered me to sit thru the entire video. However, personally I found it hard to absorb the video in its entirety. Firstly his promise to &#039;come back on these 4 categories&#039; is not kept. Secondly nowhere in his presentation does he answer the presentation&#039;s intriguing question. Finally when reading the ESOMAR document with questions to secure better neuromarketing services there seems little of new value to the &#039;hygiene&#039; aspects listed. Or am I overlooking some other value to this presentation?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finn Raben&#8217;s opening statement on 4 types of pain i.e. cost, timing, relevancy and reliability triggered me to sit thru the entire video. However, personally I found it hard to absorb the video in its entirety. Firstly his promise to &#8216;come back on these 4 categories&#8217; is not kept. Secondly nowhere in his presentation does he answer the presentation&#8217;s intriguing question. Finally when reading the ESOMAR document with questions to secure better neuromarketing services there seems little of new value to the &#8216;hygiene&#8217; aspects listed. Or am I overlooking some other value to this presentation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: neurorelay.com @ 2026-04-17 11:55:21 by W3 Total Cache -->